AI Image Detector for Photos and Digital Images

One image. Multiple professional AI detectors.

See what multiple AI detection models find in your image, compare their signals, and get a clearer basis for judging where it came from.

Prepare up to 10 images

Upload any images you want to check. You can choose the type of analysis after preparation.

How It Works

Three simple steps to assess an image

01

Choose an image

Upload, paste, or import a JPG, PNG, or WebP image up to 10MB.

02

AI Analysis

Detection models analyze the image for patterns, artifacts, and statistical signals associated with AI generation.

03

Get Results

Compare model signals and a combined estimate, then review them alongside the image source and context.

Built for Professionals

Built for teams that need an additional image-review signal

Multi-detector verification

Deep Analyze checks the same image with multiple detection models, then shows every available provider result alongside the combined estimate.

Localized AI evidence

When Copyleaks returns a valid localization mask, detector.guru overlays the reported regions on the analyzed image. Not every result includes localized evidence.

Journalists & Media

Add an AI-image signal to your review process before publication. Use it alongside source checks and other evidence.

Content Creators

Review visual content with an additional probabilistic signal before making originality decisions.

Businesses

Review user-submitted images and marketing assets with an additional AI-image risk signal.

Educators

Support academic-integrity reviews without treating an automated score as a conclusive determination.

The Problem

Why AI Image Detection Matters More Than Ever

Modern image generators can create convincing visuals, making source and provenance checks increasingly important.

Deepfake Misinformation

AI-generated photos of public figures, disaster scenes, and fabricated events spread on social media within minutes, shaping public opinion before fact-checkers can respond.

Election Interference

Synthetic images of political candidates can mislead voters and complicate verification during fast-moving election coverage.

Legal & Insurance Fraud

Fabricated evidence in court cases and fake damage photos in insurance claims are becoming harder to spot, threatening the integrity of legal and financial systems.

Eroding Public Trust

When any photo could be AI-generated, people start doubting even real images. This "liar's dividend" undermines journalism, science, and everyday communication.

Identity Theft & Scams

AI-generated headshots can be used to create fake social profiles, phishing campaigns, and romance scams.

Growing Volume

As image-generation tools become easier to use, more synthetic visuals appear alongside camera photos and edited media online.

The bottom line: Do not rely on appearance alone. Detection scores are most useful when combined with source, metadata, provenance, and contextual review.

Expert Guide

How to Tell AI Images From Reality

Visual and automated checks can both be wrong. Understanding possible signs of AI generation helps you ask better questions and combine multiple sources of evidence.

01

Unnatural Eyes & Faces

AI models still struggle with anatomical consistency. Look for asymmetric pupils, irregular iris patterns, teeth that blur together, and earlobes that melt into the jawline. In group photos, faces at the edges are often more distorted.

Detectable by humans
02

Skin Texture Anomalies

AI-generated skin often looks too smooth – almost "plastic." Pores, fine lines, and natural skin imperfections are either absent or repetitive. Hair strands near the hairline may merge or split unnaturally.

Detectable by humans
03

Background Inconsistencies

Check edges where the subject meets the background: warped lines, repeating patterns in foliage or architecture, text that looks like language but says nothing. Straight lines (fences, doorframes) often bend or disconnect.

Detectable by humans
04

Metadata & Compression Artifacts

Camera photos may include EXIF metadata such as device or exposure details, while generated or edited files may omit or replace it. Metadata can also be stripped from real photos, so its absence is only one clue.

Requires tools
05

Frequency Domain Signatures

Frequency analysis can reveal spectral patterns associated with some generation or processing methods. These patterns vary by model and editing history and should not be treated as definitive on their own.

Requires tools
06

Lighting & Physics Violations

Shadows that point in different directions, reflections that do not match the scene, and objects that defy basic physics (floating, impossible geometry). AI learns appearance, not the physical rules behind it.

Expert analysis

The Limits of Manual Detection

Visual artifacts change as generation and editing tools evolve. Combine automated estimates with the image source, metadata, provenance, and contextual review instead of relying on a single sign or score.

Simple, Credit-Based Pricing

Pay only for what you use. Choose any amount from 1-100 checks after signup.

Try once

Single image check

$1.00/ 1 checks
$1.00 per check
  • No subscription required
  • One-time credit packs
  • Fast analysis
  • Detailed confidence scores
Get Started
Most Popular

Focused batch

A practical pack for active review

$17.70/ 25 checks
$0.71 per checkSave 29%
  • No subscription required
  • One-time credit packs
  • Fast analysis
  • Detailed confidence scores
Get Started

Best value

Maximum progressive savings

$45.00/ 100 checks
$0.45 per checkSave 55%
  • No subscription required
  • One-time credit packs
  • Fast analysis
  • Detailed confidence scores
Get Started

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about detector.guru